[ Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia - ONLINE ]
E-ISSN 2586-8470
[ Journal Abbreviation: Pharm.Sci.Asia ]
Mahidol University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences
  FORMER NAME   "Mahidol University Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences" Published Since 1974

 
Abstracts

DOI: 10.29090/psa.2025.04.25.5178Pharm Sci Asia 2025; 52(4), 541-560
 

Comparative impact of ketofol vs propofol on postoperative cognitive, functional and pain outcomes in surgical patients

Daisy Priya Pugazhenthi1, Abul Yasar. M1, Dhanuja Ravichandran1, Maheshwari Paramasivam1*, Karthickeyan Krishnan1, Shanmugasundaram Palani2

1 Department of Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, Pallavaram, Chennai – 600117, Tamil Nadu, India
2 Dean, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Vels Institute of Science, Technology and Advanced Studies, Pallavaram, Chennai – 600117, Tamil Nadu, India


Postoperative cognitive dysfunction is an emerging condition associated with surgery under general anesthesia, especially in elderly patients, with major detrimental health effects. To optimize anesthetic drug use, the study aimed to evaluate the effects of ketofol (ketamine-propofol combination) on postoperative cognition, pain, and functional recovery in comparison with propofol. In this prospective, observational, and comparative study, 52 patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on the anesthetic agent employed for induction: either ketofol (Group KP) or propofol (Group P). Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) preoperatively and at 2, 24 and 48 hours post-surgery. Functional recovery was examined using the Modified Aldrete Score (MAS), and pain levels were recorded at the same time intervals using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Hemodynamics were also monitored during the procedure. Data were initially analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U Test and student’s t-test; subsequently, Linear Mixed Models (LMM) were employed to adjust for potential covariates. MoCA scores at 24 and 48 hours were significantly higher in the ketofol group (p = 0.001 and p = 0.002), but MMSE scores showed no statistical difference. Pain scores were significantly lower in the ketofol group at 2, 24, and 48 hours (p = 0.010, p = 0.001, and p = 0.0001). However, LMM did not confirm these findings as statistically significant. Ketofol demonstrated better hemodynamic stability, especially in terms of systolic and diastolic blood pressure and SpO2 readings. Although Ketofol was associated with better postoperative cognitive preservation, pain control, and hemodynamic stability compared to propofol in the unadjusted analyses, adjusted models indicated that these differences could be influenced by confounders such as age and gender, necessitating further investigation into its clinical use.


Keyword:

Cognitive dysfunction; Ketofol; Propofol; Pain; Postoperative; Recovery of function




Download full paper (PDF File size: 1,213.74 KB.)





Vol.52
No.4
October-December 2025

See other volume

 


Vol.52
No.3
July-September 2025

See other volume

 


Vol.52
No.2
April-June 2025

See other volume

 


Vol.52
No.1
January-March 2025

See other volume

 
 
 

Home
Aims and Scope
Editorial Board
Publication Ethics
Instruction to Authors
Announcement
All Volumes & Issues
Submit Online
Contact us
   
Search
   
Faculty of Pharmacy Mahidol University
Mahidol University
Member's menu

You're now loging on with following account:
Guest (unknown)

Please Sign in or Register



Pharmaceutical Sciences Asia by Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, Thailand is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

    Copyright © 2017-2026
    Faculty of Pharmacy, Mahidol University, THAILAND
 

We use Cookies

This site uses cookies to personalise your experience and analyse site traffic. By Clicking ACCEPT or continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies.